How is that the ukronazis even after loosing a million plus people still have soldiers in all this sectors and still fighting? How many do they still have available?
I try to follow your maps with my sasplanet prog. very hard to find any matches. your maps show many more places than any of mine available to me through sasplanet and often those we do share seem to have different names.
any helpful suggestions you may have about this would be much appreciated.
I think they'd have the resources to satisfy any curiosity they might have have wouldn't they?
Am I perhaps missing the point? You're trolling or jesting or something? Sorry, I don't get it.
By the way, I don't think that Institute 'studies' war; I rather think it studies propaganda. It is clearly biased and worse. I mean: bias isn't necessarily bad, not at all. In fact we all should be biased all the time. Towards the good. Right?
So there's 'worse' than being biased.
And what is it?
Telling untruths and half truths to try to bolster your case.
I've noticed that the Russian command could take upwards of a few weeks to announce capture of a town/village. They wait until clearing not only said town but several kilometres in whichever direction. Whereas, as soon as the UAF take a treeline it's a big deal, due to the fact any forward momentum on their part is few and far between.
It seems to me, and there's no way I can stand up to your obvious military prowess (I read you all the time) that the Russian command like to keep the enemy guessing on their exact whereabouts. That the maps and details here are more sensitive than any other site.
How is that the ukronazis even after loosing a million plus people still have soldiers in all this sectors and still fighting? How many do they still have available?
Thank you!
I try to follow your maps with my sasplanet prog. very hard to find any matches. your maps show many more places than any of mine available to me through sasplanet and often those we do share seem to have different names.
any helpful suggestions you may have about this would be much appreciated.
:)
The Institute for the Study of War are also interested to know comrade arthur.
I think they'd have the resources to satisfy any curiosity they might have have wouldn't they?
Am I perhaps missing the point? You're trolling or jesting or something? Sorry, I don't get it.
By the way, I don't think that Institute 'studies' war; I rather think it studies propaganda. It is clearly biased and worse. I mean: bias isn't necessarily bad, not at all. In fact we all should be biased all the time. Towards the good. Right?
So there's 'worse' than being biased.
And what is it?
Telling untruths and half truths to try to bolster your case.
Tongue in cheek arthur!
I've noticed that the Russian command could take upwards of a few weeks to announce capture of a town/village. They wait until clearing not only said town but several kilometres in whichever direction. Whereas, as soon as the UAF take a treeline it's a big deal, due to the fact any forward momentum on their part is few and far between.
It seems to me, and there's no way I can stand up to your obvious military prowess (I read you all the time) that the Russian command like to keep the enemy guessing on their exact whereabouts. That the maps and details here are more sensitive than any other site.
Thank you for your work.