Discussion about this post

User's avatar
arthur brogard's avatar

God I'm pleased to see that. I have long been complaining that the 'civil war' aspect of this conflict is universally ignored and naturally along with it the heroism and long suffering of the Donbas people and troops.

It has always seemed to me that the western masses would never have so readily and docilely let their lunatic leaders promote, foment and encourage this war if they'd known they were setting one part of Ukraine against the other part of Ukraine.

On ethnic lines ! In order to promote ethnic inequality and oppression.

They don't know. They didn't know and they still don't know.

So even though the Donbas States are now part of Russia I still prefer to refer to it in 'civil war' type terms whenever I can: never referring to 'Ukraine' when what is meant is 'Kiev Ukraine' and always considering the good of all Ukrainians when I talk of 'Ukraine'.

After all they - Kiev and Washington, etc. - refuse to accept that it is part of Russia.

Hence they clearly are prosecuting a Civil War. That is how they see it.

And they make no bones about it being on ethnic grounds. Their ethnic hatred is surpassed only by Israelis.

So I like to follow the actions of the Donbas forces when I can and I like to point out to people that this or that action was the Donbas forces.

This is an excellent repudiation of the claims of many hysterical Kiev Ukrainians that the Donbas has been invaded or overrun or captured by Russia for no invaded, captured, overrun people would fight as the Donbas people do.

So I like to have examples to show them, to shut them up and hopefully educate them.

This little essay (in coming up near three years of the conflict) is the best essay I have seen yet that helps me put that view.

Thanks. :)

Expand full comment
Davy Ro's avatar

🫡

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts