The Armed Forces of Ukraine - a victim of the blitzkrieg (abortion)

By Marat Khairullin

The events of the past week show that, apparently, the Ukrops have decided to finally abandon the right-bank group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and try to dig in on the left bank of the Dnieper. (I would like to clarify right away that I am not orienting myself by the river flow, but by looking at the map, and I am naming the sides in relation to Donetsk). [Zin Note: Normally, the Ukrainian side of the river is referred to as the "right bank" as this would be on your right if you were standing up river facing the mouth of it, so just reverse the two for the purposes of this article. :)]

Moreover, this is not even a plan, but a semblance, to simply convince their suicide bombers, who have already been abandoned near Pokrovsk, Chasov Yar, and elsewhere, that the command is going somewhere, and that it even has some kind of plan.

You will laugh, but this plan is another blitzkrieg, which the Ukrops respectfully call a counteroffensive, but in fact it is a quick and shameful death. But the word itself has a magical effect on the enemy: it is enough for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to promise a counteroffensive and a quick victory over the Muscovites, and the Ukrops run to die with renewed joy. "What if this time it works out!?" This question is already such a national slogan.

But to understand that the Ukro command has already sentenced its troops, who at this moment are still sitting in the trenches near Donetsk, let's roll back a few months, when Avdiivka was taken in February. After that, for five months, our troops gradually went on the offensive in different parts of the front. Immediately after Avdiivka, at the turn of February-March, our troops became active in the Bakhmut direction, and they are currently storming Chasov Yar. This battle, as a separate episode of this war, has been going on for more than five months, with rare breaks. According to various estimates, it is believed that the battle for Chasov Yar directly connects the enemy's sixty-thousand-strong group.
Immediately after the May holidays, our command opened the Kharkov front, namely the Liptsevsky and Volchansky sections, as a result of which the Ukrainian Armed Forces were forced to transfer an additional fifty thousand group here.

Then it was Krasnogorovka's turn: as soon as the main forces of our army reached the line along the Karlovskoye Reservoir, the battle for the last major outpost of the Ukrainian Armed Forces near Donetsk began - Krasnogorovka.

At the same time, active movement began on the neighboring, most important section – the Ugledar-Konstantinovka-Maryinka highway.

At the moment, Krasnogorovka has been taken, and this route has been cut by us in several places. And already in the summer, a rapid operation began to destroy the most fortified section of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' defense - this is Toretsk-New York. At the same time, the defense near Kupyansk was breached, where our troops reached the most important crossings of the Ukrainian Armed Forces over the Oskol River. Of course, we must remember the Severskoye direction - this is the line of Razdolovka - Berestovoye - Spornoye, and let's not discount the phenomenal advance of our troops in the main direction of this war, Pokrovsk either.

The Ukrop troops have lost 215 thousand people killed and wounded in the five months since the capture of Avdiivka, and 270 thousand since the beginning of the year. At the same time, according to Zelensky himself, the number of ground forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the beginning of the year was 600 thousand people. Apparently, these are the troops that are directly at the front.

That is, since the beginning of the year we have eliminated almost half of the personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the rate of utilization is only increasing.
But the most important thing is that, during these months, Syrsky has already publicly reported seven times that the Russian army was stopped. They "stopped" the Pokrovsk direction alone four times.

The funniest thing is that, in addition to this "general counter-stop," a "counter-offensive" has already been publicly promised three times: near Vovchansk, all the way to Shebekino, Liptsy, and, of course, in Zaporozhye near Rabotino.

There was also a stationary counter-offensive near Krynki, but that's purely a psy-op. Even the Ukrops can't explain what kind of schizophrenia it was that cost thousands of the best soldiers' lives. It's mystery of nature, and in a word, we won't discuss it.

"Counter-offensives" have already become a cope for all occasions for the Ukrops - they surrendered another bridgehead, no big deal, you just need to publicly promise a counter-offensive and you can continue to retreat.

If you don't know what to ask the owners for money, no problem - promise a counterattack and go ahead, and so on - if you've embezzled the funds, no problem, the counterattack will write it all off...

In short, disinformation specialists are studying the state of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in these counter-offensives. There are even such firm signs - if, for example, the CIPSO has been dumping super-duper exclusives about another counter-offensive through Russian military bloggers all week, it means that some serious facility is being surrendered. For example, Krasnogorovka. The thing is that the situation in the main directions of our attacks is such that everyone involved understands that as soon as our troops get around to the next area, the Ukies there are doomed. In order to somehow keep their doomed troops in the trenches, they are fed this kind of bait. Do you think that they are working for us through our bloggers - no, they are telling their doomed soldiers: look, even Russian bloggers are writing about our counteroffensive, so it definitely exists. The main thing is that you hold on.

There is a very specific story behind all this. The fact is that, about a month ago, on the eve of that very NATO summit, a certain gathering of a large analytical group took place under the wing of the RAND Corporation. Here, too, a little background - the fact is that the Ukrainian crisis has clearly designated authors. Just like the Chechen war in its time.

Let's say that the author of the first Chechen war in expert circles is considered to be such an American political scientist as John Joseph Sullivan. He ignited it formally in the interests of the oil companies of the USA and Britain. In reality, he justified its necessity by laying the foundations for the further collapse of Russia.

This is what our “good friend and partner” wrote, by the way in connection with the urgent need for further fragmentation of Russia…

The Ukrainian project, or rather the war with Russia at the hands of Ukrainians, has exactly the same authors. I will name them in my special investigation on Thursday. In the meantime, let us state that these same “arsonists,” who gathered for another Sabbath under the wing of RAND, agreed that, relatively speaking, the plan was a success, but there are nuances.

The main one is these Ukrops defeated near Donetsk. If they return to the left bank (again, the "right bank" if you go by the flow of the river) of the Dnieper, they will pose the main threat to the US positions in Ukropia.

That's true, all these veterans who got their faces punched on the Eastern Front will sooner or later start asking - you promised us something completely different. That's why it's dangerous to return them to Kyiv, let them die near Donetsk while a new front line is being built along the Dnieper.